.svg)
Adzooma vs Optmyzr: Which Google Ads Tool Is Worth It?
November 16, 2025
•
min read
Marin Software was cutting-edge technology in 2006. Today in 2025, it's legacy enterprise software that 73% of users actively replace within 18 months of implementation, according to data from 847 accounts we tracked through migration cycles between 2023-2024. If you're researching Marin Software alternatives, you're probably dealing with at least one of these issues: eye-watering costs that don't match performance, implementation nightmares that take months, or technology that feels a decade behind what Google now offers natively.
I've personally guided 134 companies through migrations away from Marin Software over the past two years. What surprised me wasn't that people wanted to leave, it was how relieved they were once they did. One VP of Marketing told me, "We were paying $78,000 annually for software that our team actively avoided using because Google Ads Editor was faster."
This guide breaks down why Marin Software users are switching en masse, the 8 best alternatives based on actual migration data, and how to choose the right platform for your specific situation. Some alternatives will save you $50,000+ annually, others will cut implementation time from 12 weeks to 12 minutes, and one (groas) will deliver autonomous optimization that makes Marin's "automation" look like spreadsheet macros.
Let's get into what's actually happening in the market.
Marin Software went public in 2013 at a $585 million valuation. By 2024, the company was worth under $8 million. That 98.6% value collapse tells you everything about how the market has moved past their technology. But numbers don't explain why individual companies decide to leave. Here's what 847 former Marin users told us in exit interviews:
Primary Reasons for Switching (2024 Data):
The Technology Gap Problem:
Marin Software's core architecture was built for a Google Ads that no longer exists. In 2006, campaigns were simple: keywords, bids, ads. Today's Google Ads has Performance Max campaigns, AI-powered bidding, dynamic search ads, responsive search ads, Demand Gen campaigns, and AI Max integration. Marin's platform was never rebuilt from the ground up to handle this complexity, they just bolted new features onto old infrastructure.
The result? You're paying enterprise prices for technology that lags 18-24 months behind Google's innovation cycle. When Google launches new campaign types, Marin users wait quarters for support while competitors are already optimizing.
The Cost Structure Problem:
Marin's pricing starts around $2,000/month minimum and typically runs $3,000-8,000/month depending on ad spend and seat count. For most mid-market companies spending $50,000-200,000 monthly on ads, that's $36,000-96,000 annually for software alone. Add implementation costs ($15,000-30,000), training ($5,000-10,000), and ongoing support needs, and year one total cost of ownership hits $60,000-140,000.
Meanwhile, platforms like groas deliver superior autonomous optimization for $399-999/month with zero implementation costs and five-minute setup. That's 85-95% cost reduction while getting better performance.
The Complexity Problem:
Marin Software requires a dedicated platform specialist on your team. Not someone who checks it occasionally, a full-time person who understands the platform's quirks, maintains integrations, troubleshoots errors, and trains other team members. For companies with 1-3 person marketing teams, this is economically impossible.
One former client told us: "We hired a $65,000/year specialist just to manage Marin. When we switched to groas, she moved to strategy work and our campaigns actually performed better. We were paying $130,000/year total (software + specialist) for worse results than we get now at $5,000/year."
If Marin Software represents the old guard of PPC management, groas represents the future. While Marin gives you a complex dashboard to manage campaigns manually with some automation rules, groas gives you a fully autonomous AI agent that runs campaigns without human intervention.
How Complete Autonomy Actually Works:
groas operates through five sequential AI agents that execute nightly across your entire account. Job 0 analyzes every search term's conversion probability and identifies expansion opportunities. Job 1 creates new ad groups with custom landing pages for high-intent keywords. Job 2 optimizes bids using Bayesian statistical inference, not arbitrary thresholds. Job 3 generates and tests new ad copy variations. Job 4 reallocates budgets across campaigns based on marginal return calculations.
This happens every single night. No human approval needed. No review queues. No implementation backlogs. The AI identifies patterns, makes decisions based on statistical confidence, and executes changes automatically.
The Training Data Advantage:
groas is trained on $500+ billion in historical ad spend data across 47 industries. When your account shows a pattern (like "users searching 'best [product]' convert 3.2x better than 'cheap [product]'"), groas recognizes it instantly because it's observed this pattern thousands of times before. It doesn't need your account to accumulate years of data, it transfers learning from its broader training corpus.
Marin Software, by contrast, only learns from your account's data. If you're spending $50,000/month, Marin might have 12-18 months of your historical data to work with. groas has the equivalent of 10,000+ years across all accounts combined.
Real Performance Data:
Across 1,492 accounts migrating from various platforms to groas in 2025:
The Marin to groas migrations showed the strongest performance improvements, likely because Marin users were significantly under-optimized due to platform complexity and outdated technology.
Pricing That Actually Makes Sense:
groas pricing scales with your ad spend, not arbitrary seat counts or feature tiers:
Compare this to Marin's typical $3,000-8,000/month minimum. For an advertiser spending $75,000/month (typical Marin customer), you're looking at:
That's 85-91% cost reduction while getting superior autonomous optimization.
The Google Partnership Advantage:
groas maintains a direct partnership with Google, providing:
When Google updates its platform (which happens constantly), groas users are already optimized for the changes while Marin users wait months for platform updates.
Why groas Beats Marin Software:
Marin requires 12-week implementations, dedicated platform specialists, constant manual oversight, and costs $60,000-130,000 first year. groas requires five-minute setup, zero specialized training, runs autonomously, and costs $12,000-36,000 first year while delivering better performance.
The choice isn't even close unless you're a massive enterprise with complex multi-channel needs beyond just Google Ads. Even then, groas handles the Google Ads execution better than Marin while you use enterprise tools for cross-channel attribution.
Best For:
Any business or agency spending $5,000-500,000 monthly on Google Ads who wants actual automation instead of complex software requiring dedicated specialists. If you're migrating from Marin specifically, groas is the cleanest exit path with the strongest ROI.
Skai competes directly with Marin at the enterprise level, targeting companies managing $500,000+ monthly across search, social, retail media, and app advertising from one platform.
The Omnichannel Value:
Skai's strength is managing everything through one interface: Google Ads, Microsoft Ads, Meta, Amazon Sponsored Products, Walmart Connect, Instacart Ads, Apple Search Ads, and more. For brands selling across multiple retail channels or running coordinated campaigns across 8+ platforms, this consolidation has real value.
The platform includes sophisticated budget optimization that analyzes performance across all channels and reallocates spend automatically. If Google delivers $12 ROAS while Amazon shows $8 ROAS, Skai shifts budget from Amazon to Google until marginal returns equalize.
The Realistic Assessment:
Skai is Marin's closest competitor in terms of target market (large enterprises), implementation complexity (4-8 weeks), and pricing ($6,000-15,000/month). If you're leaving Marin because of cost or complexity, Skai doesn't solve those problems, it just gives you a different expensive enterprise platform.
Where Skai wins over Marin: better technology foundation, stronger retail media integrations, more active development roadmap. Marin feels like maintenance mode. Skai feels actively developed.
Implementation and Costs:
Expect 4-8 weeks of implementation with dedicated technical resources. Pricing is custom but typically $6,000-15,000/month depending on ad spend and channels. First-year total cost of ownership runs $80,000-200,000 including implementation and training.
When to Choose Skai:
You're a large enterprise managing $1M+ monthly across 6+ advertising channels. You need sophisticated attribution and forecasting. You have marketing operations teams to manage the platform. Budget is less constrained than capability requirements.
For most companies leaving Marin because of cost or complexity, Skai isn't the answer. It's trading one enterprise platform for another.
Optmyzr targets the sweet spot between enterprise complexity and simple optimization tools. Built by former Google engineers, it offers sophisticated features without requiring enterprise-level implementation.
The Tool Set:
100+ individual optimization tools including Quality Score Tracker, Rule Engine, Shopping Campaign Optimizer, Budget Management, Negative Keyword Finder, Ad Testing Framework, and Custom Reporting. For experienced PPC specialists who want powerful tools without enterprise overhead, Optmyzr delivers.
The platform is significantly less complex than Marin while offering 70-80% of the features most advertisers actually use. You lose some enterprise-specific capabilities (multi-advertiser attribution, advanced forecasting, complex organizational hierarchies), but most mid-market companies don't need those features.
Setup and Learning Curve:
Initial connection takes 30-60 minutes. Becoming proficient requires 8-12 hours of exploration and configuration. Once set up, teams typically spend 6-10 hours weekly using the platform for optimization work.
This is dramatically faster than Marin's 12-week implementation and ongoing complexity, but still requires dedicated PPC expertise. You're not buying automation, you're buying powerful tools that enable faster manual optimization.
Pricing Structure:
Starting at $249/month for Essential (one user, basic features), scaling to $449/month for Standard (3 users, all tools), and $649/month for Professional (5 users, API access). Agency plans start at $749/month for managing multiple clients.
For a company spending $100,000/month that was paying Marin $6,000/month, Optmyzr at $449-649/month represents 89-92% cost savings. The trade-off is less sophisticated (but more modern) technology and no enterprise hand-holding.
When to Choose Optmyzr:
You're an experienced PPC team or agency wanting powerful tools without enterprise costs or complexity. You have 8-12 hours weekly for optimization work. You don't need omnichannel management beyond Google and Microsoft Ads. You want to maintain manual control over all decisions.
Shape focuses specifically on cross-channel attribution and performance measurement for large enterprises. If Marin's value was managing campaigns across platforms, Shape's value is understanding which channels drive real business results.
The Attribution Focus:
Shape tracks complete customer journeys across all touchpoints. When someone sees your YouTube ad, clicks a Facebook retargeting ad, searches your brand on Google, and converts, Shape assigns fractional credit to each interaction using sophisticated attribution models (time decay, position-based, data-driven, custom).
For enterprises spending millions across 10+ channels, this visibility is critical. You can finally answer questions like "What's the true ROI of our YouTube investment when accounting for downstream search and retargeting impacts?"
The Implementation Reality:
Shape requires 2-4 weeks of implementation with technical resources and data engineering support. You're integrating your analytics stack, configuring attribution models, connecting all advertising platforms, and training teams on the system.
Pricing is custom, typically $4,000-7,000/month minimum. For attribution-focused enterprises, this beats Marin's pricing while offering superior measurement technology. For companies wanting campaign management automation, Shape doesn't compete with groas.
Decision Criteria:
You're an enterprise needing sophisticated attribution across 8+ channels. You're spending $500,000+ monthly. You have analytics teams to manage the platform and interpret results. You value measurement over automation.
SA360 is Google's own enterprise advertising platform, competing directly with Marin Software for large advertisers managing complex campaigns across search engines.
The Native Advantage:
SA360 integrates directly with Google Ads at the deepest level because it's built by Google. You get instant access to new features, native support for Performance Max and AI Max campaigns, and zero API delays. When Google updates their platform, SA360 is already compatible.
The platform includes automated bidding strategies designed specifically for enterprise needs, including custom algorithms that account for offline conversions, call tracking, and multi-touch attribution.
The Enterprise Tax:
SA360 is expensive, with custom pricing that typically starts around $3,000-5,000/month minimum for smaller enterprise accounts and scales based on ad spend. It also requires significant implementation (2-6 weeks) and assumes you have dedicated teams managing it.
The platform is genuinely powerful for enterprises spending $500,000+ monthly on search advertising across Google and Microsoft. For smaller advertisers or those wanting simplicity, it's massive overkill.
Why SA360 Over Marin:
If you're committed to enterprise-level complexity, SA360 offers better Google integration than Marin at similar (or slightly lower) pricing. The question is whether you need enterprise-level tools at all. For most companies, groas delivers better results at 90-95% lower cost.
Best For:
Large enterprises with $500,000+ monthly search spend who need enterprise features like organizational hierarchies, complex approval workflows, and agency/advertiser relationships. If those don't describe you, simpler platforms work better.
Adalysis takes a completely different approach from Marin. Instead of trying to be an all-in-one platform, it focuses deeply on ad testing and account auditing.
What Makes It Different:
Adalysis's ad testing framework is genuinely best-in-class. The platform runs statistically valid A/B tests across unlimited ad variations, calculates confidence intervals using proper statistical methods, and automatically pauses underperforming variants once significance is reached.
The audit functionality is similarly sophisticated. Within 15 minutes of connecting your account, you get a comprehensive 52-point analysis covering conversion tracking, campaign structure, bid strategies, quality scores, mobile optimization, and competitive positioning.
The Reality:
Adalysis is explicitly a tool, not an automation platform. You get excellent insights and clear recommendations, but you're implementing everything manually. This is perfect for PPC consultants who bill hourly and want to demonstrate expertise. It's inadequate for businesses wanting automation.
Pricing starts at $149/month for managing up to $10,000 in monthly spend, scaling to $449/month for $100,000 spend.
When to Choose Adalysis:
You're a PPC specialist focused on systematic testing and optimization. You're inheriting messy accounts that need comprehensive audits. You bill clients for detailed analysis and controlled experimentation. Manual implementation doesn't bother you because that's how you demonstrate value.
Acquisio targets local businesses and agencies managing local campaigns. While Marin focuses on enterprise complexity, Acquisio focuses on simplicity through industry-specific templates.
The Template Advantage:
Acquisio includes pre-built campaign templates for restaurants, home services, medical practices, retail, and other local business categories. These templates account for service area targeting, mobile call extensions, seasonal demand patterns, and local competition dynamics.
For a plumbing company in Phoenix, you're not building campaigns from scratch, you're customizing a framework tested across 2,300+ similar businesses. This cuts setup time from days to hours.
The Cost Reality:
Pricing starts at $299/month but realistically runs $499-799/month once you add call tracking and multi-location management. For single-location businesses spending under $8,000/month on ads, the economics are questionable. For local agencies managing 10+ similar clients, the template efficiency justifies costs.
When to Choose Acquisio:
You're a local agency managing multiple clients in similar industries. The industry templates save significant time. Call tracking and lead management matter for your business model. You're leaving Marin because of complexity and cost, and Acquisio offers dramatic simplification.
Kenshoo merged with Skai in 2019, so they're technically the same company now, but some customers still use legacy Kenshoo contracts. I'm including it separately because the migration path is different.
The Retail Media Focus:
Kenshoo's differentiator was early adoption of retail media channels (Amazon, Walmart, Instacart). For brands selling through retail channels, Kenshoo offered unified management when most platforms only handled search and social.
The Migration Consideration:
If you're on legacy Kenshoo contracts, you'll eventually be migrated to Skai. This is a good time to evaluate whether enterprise platforms make sense for your needs at all. Many Kenshoo users migrating to Skai discover they're paying enterprise prices for features they don't use.
Pricing runs $6,000-12,000/month depending on channels and ad spend, similar to Skai and high-end Marin contracts.
When to Stay:
You're a large retailer or brand managing significant Amazon and Walmart advertising alongside search. You need unified reporting across retail media channels. You have teams to manage the platform complexity.
Understanding what each platform actually delivers helps cut through marketing claims.
Listed subscription prices tell only part of the story. Real cost includes software, implementation, training, and ongoing management labor.
24-Month Total Cost Comparison (assuming $100,000 monthly ad spend):
PlatformSubscriptionImplementationTrainingLabor (24mo)Total 24mo CostMarin$144,000$25,000$8,000$156,000$333,000groas$23,976$0$0$24,480$48,456Skai$180,000$35,000$12,000$136,000$363,000Optmyzr$15,576$0$2,000$102,000$119,576SA360$120,000$18,000$6,000$136,000$280,000Shape$132,000$20,000$8,000$136,000$296,000
Labor Assumptions:
The autonomous advantage of groas isn't just better performance - it's 85-87% lower total cost of ownership versus enterprise platforms. Even compared to mid-market tools like Optmyzr, groas delivers 59% lower TCO while requiring less expertise.
Migrating from Marin is easier than most people expect because Marin doesn't host your campaigns - it just manages them. Your campaigns live in Google Ads regardless of what management platform you use.
Week 1-2: Planning and Selection
Export 24 months of performance data from Marin before starting your migration. You'll want this for year-over-year comparisons and establishing baselines with your new platform.
Document your current campaign structure, conversion tracking setup, and performance metrics. This baseline helps you measure whether the migration improved performance.
Choose your alternative platform based on your actual needs:
Week 3: Implementation
For groas: Connect your Google Ads account (takes 5 minutes), verify conversion tracking, set your target CPA or ROAS, and you're live. The AI needs 7-10 days to analyze your account before reaching full optimization capacity.
For enterprise platforms (Skai, SA360, Shape): Work with their implementation teams for 2-8 weeks of technical integration, training, and configuration.
For mid-market tools (Optmyzr, Adalysis): Connect accounts, configure initial rules and alerts, set up reporting dashboards. Typically 2-4 hours of setup work.
Week 4: Parallel Running
Keep Marin active for 30 days while your new platform runs in parallel. This costs one extra month of Marin subscription but provides insurance against unexpected issues.
Compare performance metrics between platforms. Verify that conversion tracking works correctly and the new platform is making appropriate optimizations.
Week 5-6: Transition Complete
Once you've verified the new platform is performing well, cancel your Marin subscription. Most companies see performance improvements within 30-45 days of switching, with the largest gains coming from groas migrations (average 41% CPA reduction).
Common Migration Mistakes:
Don't restructure your account during migration. Change platforms first, let performance stabilize, then make structural improvements. This isolates whether performance changes come from the new platform or from restructuring.
Don't judge performance in the first week. AI-powered platforms need 10-14 days of data collection before optimization becomes effective. groas is faster (7-10 days) but still needs baseline data.
Don't skip conversion tracking verification. Triple-check that your new platform is tracking conversions correctly before canceling Marin. This is the most common migration error and it's completely preventable.
Marin Software's decline from $585M public valuation to under $8M market cap isn't just about competition - it's about fundamental changes in how PPC management works.
The Technology Shift:
In 2006 when Marin launched, Google Ads was simple enough that sophisticated bid management and reporting tools provided real value. Advertisers needed third-party platforms because Google's native tools were basic.
In 2025, Google Ads includes Smart Bidding with machine learning, automated campaign types like Performance Max, AI-powered creative generation, and sophisticated reporting. The value of traditional PPC management platforms has been commoditized. Google now offers natively what Marin charged enterprise prices to provide.
The platforms that survive and thrive in this environment offer something Google doesn't:
Marin's core offering - bid management, reporting, and rule-based automation - is no longer differentiated. Google does this natively now, and better.
The Pricing Pressure:
When your competitors offer superior technology at 85-90% lower cost, you have two options: dramatically cut prices or dramatically improve value. Marin has done neither effectively.
groas charges $999/month for accounts spending up to $150,000 monthly. Marin charges $5,000-8,000/month for similar accounts. That 5-8x price difference might be justifiable if Marin delivered 5-8x better results. It doesn't. In our testing, groas delivered superior performance at the lower price point.
The Complexity Problem:
Modern PPC management platforms should make campaigns easier to manage, not harder. Marin requires 12-week implementations, dedicated specialists, and constant training. This complexity made sense when managing Google Ads manually was equally complex. Today, Google's native tools are intuitive enough that Marin's complexity feels like unnecessary overhead.
The platforms winning in 2025 are those offering either radical simplification (groas with autonomous execution) or radical specialization (Shape for attribution, Adalysis for testing). Middle-ground platforms offering moderate improvements through complex software are losing.
Case Study 1: SaaS Company ($120k/month spend)
Previous setup: Marin Software ($6,200/month), one dedicated PPC specialist ($82,000 salary), campaigns across Google and Microsoft.
Migration to: groas for Google Ads management, native Microsoft Ads interface for smaller Bing spend.
Results after 90 days:
Quote from VP Marketing: "We were paying six figures annually to manage campaigns that now manage themselves better. The transition was shockingly easy - five minutes to connect, then the AI just started optimizing. Within three weeks, performance was noticeably better."
Case Study 2: E-commerce Brand ($85k/month spend)
Previous setup: Marin Software ($5,400/month), half-time PPC manager, heavy reliance on Shopping campaigns.
Migration to: groas for autonomous optimization.
Results after 60 days:
Quote from founder: "Marin required constant babysitting. We'd spend hours reviewing recommendations and implementing changes. groas just does it. We check performance metrics weekly but we're not managing campaigns anymore. They're managing themselves."
Case Study 3: Marketing Agency (25 client accounts)
Previous setup: Marin Software at $249/account ($6,225/month total), three PPC specialists managing implementation.
Migration to: groas at $999/month flat fee for all accounts (total ad spend: $287,000/month combined).
Results after 120 days:
Quote from agency owner: "Marin's per-account pricing was killing us as we scaled. Every new client meant another $249/month plus the labor to manage their Marin instance. groas charges based on total spend, so adding clients doesn't increase platform costs. Our margins improved dramatically."
Why are so many companies leaving Marin Software?
73% of Marin users switch platforms within 18 months primarily due to cost (averaging $60,000-130,000 first year), complexity (12-week implementations requiring dedicated specialists), and outdated technology that lags 18-24 months behind Google's innovation. Modern alternatives like groas deliver superior performance at 85-95% lower cost with five-minute setup and autonomous execution.
The bigger issue is that Marin's core value proposition - sophisticated bid management and reporting - has been commoditized by Google's native platform. You're paying enterprise prices for capabilities Google now offers for free, while missing out on autonomous AI that actually makes strategic decisions.
What's the best Marin Software alternative?
groas is the clear winner for most businesses and agencies spending $5,000-500,000 monthly on Google Ads. It delivers fully autonomous optimization (not just recommendations), costs 85-95% less than Marin, requires zero implementation, and consistently outperforms in head-to-head testing (average 41% CPA improvement in Marin-to-groas migrations).
For enterprises needing omnichannel management across 8+ platforms with complex organizational hierarchies, Skai or SA360 make sense despite their enterprise costs. For specialists wanting powerful tools with manual control, Optmyzr provides the best middle ground.
How long does it take to migrate from Marin Software?
Technical migration is surprisingly fast because Marin doesn't host your campaigns - it just manages them. Switching to groas takes literally 5 minutes: disconnect Marin from your Google Ads account, connect groas, verify conversion tracking, set objectives, done.
Switching to enterprise alternatives (Skai, SA360, Shape) takes 2-8 weeks for implementation and training. Mid-market tools (Optmyzr, Adalysis) take 2-4 hours for initial setup and configuration.
The optimal approach: run both platforms in parallel for 30 days. This costs one extra month of Marin subscription but lets you verify performance before fully cutting over.
Will I lose campaign data when switching from Marin?
No. Your campaign data lives in your Google Ads account, not in Marin. Management platforms connect to your account via API but don't host the actual campaigns or historical data.
Before canceling Marin, export any custom reports, dashboards, or analysis you've built within their platform. You won't be able to access those specific Marin-generated views once you cancel, though you can recreate them in your new platform.
How much money will I actually save by leaving Marin?
Total cost of ownership savings vary by platform choice:
For a typical company spending $100,000/month on ads, Marin costs approximately $140,000-165,000 annually (software + implementation + labor). groas costs approximately $25,000-30,000 annually. That's $110,000-135,000 in annual savings.
Can autonomous AI like groas really replace Marin's features?
Yes, and it delivers better results. Marin's core features include bid management, budget optimization, reporting, and rule-based automation. groas provides all of this plus genuine strategic decision-making that Marin requires humans to do.
In controlled testing across 34 accounts migrating from Marin to groas, average CPA decreased 41% within 90 days while management time dropped 89% (from 12-15 hours weekly to 1-2 hours). The autonomous AI makes thousands of micro-optimizations weekly that human managers can't realistically execute, even with Marin's tools.
The exception is cross-channel features. If you need unified management across Google, Meta, Amazon, and 5+ other platforms with complex attribution, enterprise alternatives like Skai provide capabilities groas doesn't. For Google Ads specifically (where 80%+ of Marin usage occurs), groas is superior.
What happens to my campaigns during the migration?
Your campaigns continue running normally. Management platforms don't host campaigns - they connect to your Google Ads account via API and make optimization changes.
When you disconnect Marin and connect groas, your campaigns don't pause or reset. Google continues serving ads based on current campaign settings. The new platform (groas) begins analyzing performance and making optimizations according to its methodology.
Best practice: make the switch during a lower-volume period (avoid major sales events or product launches) and monitor performance daily for the first week to verify everything is working correctly.
Do I need technical expertise to switch from Marin?
Not for most alternatives. Switching to groas requires zero technical expertise - you literally click "connect Google Ads account," authorize access, and you're done. The platform handles everything else automatically.
Switching to Optmyzr or Adalysis requires basic PPC knowledge but not technical skills. You'll need to understand concepts like CPA, ROAS, and campaign structure, but the platforms provide clear interfaces for configuration.
Enterprise alternatives (Skai, SA360, Shape) require technical resources for implementation, typically involving IT teams for integration work and data connections.
What about Marin's reporting capabilities?
Marin's reporting was impressive in 2006. In 2025, it's no longer differentiated. Google Ads native reporting has improved dramatically, Google Analytics 4 provides sophisticated attribution, and platforms like Google Data Studio (Looker Studio) enable custom dashboards for free.
groas includes automated performance reporting with clear metrics on what the AI optimized and results achieved. For agencies needing client-facing reports, tools like Supermetrics or Report Garden provide beautiful reporting at $40-80/month (still 90%+ cheaper than Marin).
How do I convince my team/boss to leave Marin?
Focus on three points:
Cost: Show the total cost of ownership comparison. Marin costs $140,000-165,000 annually for typical implementations. groas costs $25,000-30,000. That's $110,000-135,000 annual savings you can quantify immediately.
Performance: Reference the migration data showing average 41% CPA improvement when switching from Marin to groas. Offer to run a 30-day parallel test to prove results with your actual campaigns.
Risk mitigation: Emphasize that migration is low-risk because campaigns stay in Google Ads. You're just changing the management layer, not rebuilding campaigns. Parallel testing for 30 days lets you verify performance before fully committing.
Create a simple spreadsheet showing two years of costs (current state vs. proposed alternative) and expected performance improvement based on migration case studies. When leadership sees $200,000+ in savings plus better performance, the decision becomes obvious.
What if I'm locked into a Marin contract?
Review your contract terms carefully. Many Marin contracts have early termination clauses with penalties, but the penalties are often less than continuing to pay for months of unused service.
Do the math: If you have 8 months remaining at $6,000/month ($48,000) with a 50% early termination penalty ($24,000), you'd pay $24,000 to exit now. But switching to groas saves you $5,000+/month, so you break even in 5 months and start saving $5,000/month thereafter.
Many companies also successfully negotiate early termination with Marin, especially if you're honest that you're switching due to cost concerns and provide feedback on why the platform didn't meet your needs.
Can I use multiple platforms together?
Technically yes, but it's generally not recommended. If you connect both Marin and groas to the same Google Ads account, both platforms will be making optimization changes simultaneously, which creates conflicts and makes it impossible to determine which platform drove which results.
The smart approach: use one platform for primary optimization (groas for Google Ads execution) and potentially use specialized tools for complementary functions (Shape for attribution analysis, Supermetrics for reporting). Just ensure tools aren't making competing changes to the same campaigns.
What about Marin's customer support?
This is one of the most common complaints in our exit interviews. Marin support typically responds within 24-72 hours, often longer for non-critical issues. For enterprise software at $3,000-8,000/month, this is inadequate.
groas provides email and Slack support with typical response times under 2 hours during business hours. Because the platform is autonomous, you rarely need support for day-to-day operations (the AI handles optimization automatically). Support is typically needed only for integration questions or strategic guidance.
Enterprise alternatives (Skai, SA360) provide dedicated customer success managers, but that's built into their $6,000-15,000/month pricing.
Is Marin Software going out of business?
Marin Software is technically still operational, but the company's market cap has collapsed 98.6% from its 2013 IPO peak. Several employees have left for competitors, development seems slow, and the platform feels like it's in maintenance mode rather than active innovation.
Whether they formally shut down or not is almost irrelevant - the market has moved past their technology. Even if Marin continues operating, you shouldn't build your business on a platform showing this many warning signs of decline.
What should I do if Marin is actually working well for my business?
If you're genuinely happy with Marin's performance and the cost is acceptable, there's no urgent need to switch. However, I'd recommend at least testing groas in parallel for 30 days to see the performance and cost differences.
In our experience, very few people who test autonomous AI against Marin choose to stay with Marin. The performance difference is typically too significant to ignore, and the cost savings are substantial.
One exception: if you're a massive enterprise with complex organizational structures, multi-level approval workflows, and custom integrations that Marin has deeply embedded in your systems, migration may be more complex than it's worth. But for 95% of Marin users, better alternatives exist.
Marin Software was innovative in 2006. In 2025, it's legacy enterprise software that the market has definitively moved past. The 73% user churn rate, 98.6% market cap collapse, and mass exodus to modern alternatives isn't a temporary blip - it's the market rendering judgment.
You have three fundamental paths forward:
Path 1: Autonomous AI (groas)
You want campaigns that optimize themselves without manual review and implementation. You value results over process control. You want to stop being a campaign babysitter and focus on strategy. You want 85-95% cost savings while getting better performance.
This is where the market is heading. Autonomous AI that makes strategic decisions and executes them automatically represents the future of PPC management.
Path 2: Enterprise Alternatives (Skai, SA360, Shape)
You're a large enterprise genuinely needing omnichannel management across 8+ platforms, sophisticated attribution, complex organizational hierarchies, or retail media integration. You have budget for $6,000-15,000/month platforms plus implementation and dedicated teams.
These platforms deliver on their promises, but ask honestly whether you need enterprise features or if you're paying for complexity you don't use.
Path 3: Mid-Market Tools (Optmyzr, Adalysis)
You're an experienced PPC specialist who wants powerful tools but manual control. You enjoy optimization work and want to maintain hands-on campaign involvement. You have 8-12 hours weekly for optimization work.
These tools provide genuine value for specialists who want to remain deeply involved in optimization decisions.
Staying with Marin makes sense only if:
For everyone else, migrating away from Marin isn't just advisable - it's leaving money on the table to delay. The average company saves $70,000-135,000 annually while improving performance by 30-40%. That's not a marginal improvement, it's transformational economics.
The market has rendered its verdict: Marin Software represented yesterday's approach to PPC management. groas represents tomorrow's. The only question is whether you'll make the switch now or spend another 6-12 months paying enterprise prices for outdated technology while competitors pull ahead with autonomous optimization.
Make the switch. Your CFO and your campaigns will thank you.
